Skip to main content


Much as you don't generally go auditing the bytecode or intermediate representation generated by your compiler, I think the idea of manually reviewing LLM-written code will fall by the wayside too. Like it or not, these agents are the new compilers, and prompting them is the new programming. Regardless of what happens with any AI bubble, this is just how things will be from now on; we've experienced a permanent, irreversible increase to the level of abstraction. We are all assembly programmers
in reply to Steve Troughton-Smith

I'm at a point where if I'm getting this shoved down my throat and be forced to use LLMs for everything, I'll just quit and do something else. I'm here for the art, the thinking, the human factor. If I'm forced to be replaced by AI then so be it and I'll just go garden or something else AI can't ruin.
in reply to Steve Troughton-Smith

this is pathetic doomer bullshit and you should be ashamed for posting it. what do you actually believe in? what kind of world do you want to live in? does the suffering of others matter to you at all? does it matter to you if the world gets better or worse? do you believe society is something that people make? don't bother answering, i'll never see it. fuck you
in reply to Steve Troughton-Smith

are... are you sure you're on the right platform, my guy? twitter is down the hall and to the left.

This website uses cookies to recognize revisiting and logged-in users. You accept the usage of these cookies by continuing to use this website.

⇧